There have been plentiful studies, commentaries, reports etc on the development of economies, natural resources, military might, the effects of ill-conceived (and dreadfully executed) foreign policy adventures. There are also a number of drip-drip studies (some quite bogus, others interesting) that tend to confirm and reconfirm our European prejudices about American ignorance.
The two that struck me today were these:
One survey of first year students (i.e. 18 year olds) revealed that the majority did not know that Czechoslovakia ever existed, nor that Germany had ever been divided, nor that John McEnroe used to play tennis (rather than be an ad-celebrity), nor that Apartheid existed in South Africa (a trend in ignorance first observed in 2006). When prompted with the expression Banana Republic, the majority thought they were referring to a brand and did not understand the expression in the historical-political sense.
Another survey (amongst American adults in general) demonstrated that a fifth (that is every fifth American!) believes that Barack Obama is a Muslim. This either shows that Americans can be incredibly gullible and impressionable, or - more worryingly - that there is a fundamental misunderstanding of compromise, 'Americanness', and dialogue (of course this survey was made against the backdrop of the 'Mosque' debate in New York).
This is not a case of bashing Americans. Not at all. It's simply a consideration why predictions of America's soon-to-be decline are rarely linked to the ever-increasing inward turn in US society as a whole. How is it possible that a country that was build on the idea of ever-growing horizons have turned so in on itself that apparently a good number of Americans barely comprehend their own country, let alone the world beyond the big blue sea? A country that has prized itself on its innovations now produces students (students, no less) who have never heard of the major developments and actors of around their own birth (not in some mythical distant past).
Is this indeed an integral part of how a country 'plays' on the international scene? There are often (lazy) references to Rome and decadence (of course the Roman Empire was at its strongest during some of the most 'decadent' periods - but never mind), but what about ignorance and decline? On the day that A-Level results are being published and the Great Education Debate starts afresh in that annual ritual, it is certainly worth bearing this in mind and also a word of warning how important and delicate the education system is. It is not about establishing 'global power' or anything, but about shaping a society that works. Education has certainly a key role to play, as the US (and perhaps most stingingly the 'progressives') are maybe just finding out.

8 comments:
Gary Trudeau has been playing on this theme since the 80s of the woeful lack of knowledge of the world among children.
I'm not convinced myself that Americans are worse than anyone else: one newspaper report claimed that nearly 50% of Scots schoolchildren studying history believe the Act of Union was imposed on Scotland by an English army!
Hi Edwin,
I don't buy the idea that Europeans are 'just as bad'. Let's take that statistic you just cited: It is a wholly different story to believe that the act of Union was imposed (at least they know it exists at all!) as opposed to never having heard of the division of Germany or Czechoslovakia.
One is a misapprehension of understanding, the other an absence of knowledge altogether (that's leaving aside the fact that the Act of the Union is now over 300 years old whereas the other two examples are examples from roughly the birth of the questioned.
Europeans are less insular than Americans, in my opinion, based on both personal experience and external reports.
What we should be asking is what impact such insular attitudes have on societies.
Ach you're likely right Olching. My American cousin would agree with you. He is horrified at the lack of just basic knowledge about the world among his students.
Hi Olching
Yep it's an interesting dilemma with education on both the US and Europe...on a basic knowledge level it's just bloody appalling...but...
It seems that the mentality that encouraged the subordination of education even at the highest levels, where it has become almost entirely instrumental in problem solving within a dominant ideological download, as opposed free-thinking, has bled through to all levels of education...
...the question for this mindset is what is the point of knowing anything anyway if it's not useful in an immediate and recognisable way?..especially when experts have knowledge to answer questions that are irrelevant to ordinary people...instrumental education has devalued personal growth...
Illich and Zizek are spot on on this subject I think - we should expect the US to be more "schooled" than Europe merely because it is more prone to an instrumental market mentality...
...but on a deeper level the two continents are as sad as each other...
I have no idea who Lena is. It sure isn't me. I must have lied about my name when I created that Google_-ID./Ellymiranda (Elisabeth originally)
Sorry Olching! Please bin both my comments. I didn’t think much this time./ Elly
Hi olching,
Thanks for your thought-provoking blog - pre-rant alert:)
Am I right in interpreting your stance as disappointment in the failure of education in economically wealthy countries?
That is: the economically enabled (capitalists) disable educational opportunities in order to thwart an imagination of a world beyond the cult of *this country knows what is best - don't question - look no further*. Is that your thesis?
Well if it is, I have to preface this comment with my total, absolute, fucked-offness with data-sets. Statistics have a place - somewhere on the planet of *Believe-Me*. I think if we questioned teenage students in Bangladesh we'd be (one): hard pressed to find students of this standard who weren't from families that run the country, (two) who knew where Alabama was - or even cared, (three) had heard of Milton's 'Paradise Lost' and (four) had a passing inkling about WW1, WW2, the Falklands - and who the fuck was Thatcher.
I understand your dismay in an education system that eternally pedals local ideology. But there's a bigger world out there than students in data sub-sets that respond to cold-calling statistians.
A much-bigger world.
And you're right - if we blinker *our* youth how can we complain if *their* youth don't get the bigger picture.
all the best, parallax
Hi Lester,
I guess my bewilderment is how quickly (relatively quickly) the US has collected the badge of ignorance, from what was once a frontier-facing (albeit blood-based) country...and then of course its concurrent decline with the ever-increasing growth in ignorance.
I generally agree with Zizek and Illich's point though.
Hi Elly,
Not sure why you deleted your other comment. It seemed quite pertinent. If you don't know who Lena is, then I suppose neither do I!
Hope all is well.
Hi Parallax,
Edwin made a similar point, and perhaps you are both right to raise it.
I have no evidence to suggest the opposite of what you say, and it's always difficult to compare ignorance of, say, Czechoslovakia, with the ignorance of the capital of Kansas, but, despite all, my hunch is that these stats do tell us something about an acute unawareness in American society (which doesn't necessarily need to be compared to others due to the US' unique position), which is now paying negative dividends.
It isn't so much about capitalist countries not providing education (some do, e.g. Sweden, until Lester and Elly tell us otherwise), but - as I just mentioned to Lester - about the quick turnover from frontier to inward thinking (without calling frontier thinking good per se, as history tells us otherwise).
Cheers.
Post a Comment